Verlenging naturalisatietermijnen

Reactie

Vraag1

To whom it may interest,

I do not support the proposal to extend the residency requirement for naturalization to ten years. While neighboring countries such as Germany are easing their rules in order to attract highly educated and skilled individuals, I find it both concerning and illogical that the Netherlands is moving in the opposite direction.

Of course, it is important to review the current rules regarding integration. For example, stricter language requirements (which are already under discussion) or more demanding cultural/integration exams could be considered. Extending the term from five to six or seven years might also be reasonable. However, directly raising the requirement to ten years will undoubtedly lead to a significant decrease in the number of expats choosing the Netherlands.

The Dutch economy relies not only on its local workforce but also on highly qualified international professionals. It is therefore clear that increasing the requirement to ten years will not address the real issues. In my view, the true focus should be on irregular migration and on migrants or asylum seekers who fail to integrate into society.

Another point of concern is that well-educated individuals who studied abroad, work full-time in the Netherlands (45 hours per week or more), speak multiple languages, are open to integrating into Dutch culture, and wish to contribute positively to the country, may be discouraged by this law and choose another country instead. Such an outcome would certainly not be in the interest of anyone who cares about the well-being of the Netherlands.

I trust that the Dutch people and policymakers—who have always distinguished themselves through their common sense, understanding, and openness towards different cultures and backgrounds—will also make the right decision on this matter.

Yours sincerely,