Verlenging naturalisatietermijnen

Reactie

Vraag1

I strongly object to the proposal to extend the naturalisation period for highly skilled migrants in the Netherlands from 5 to 10 years, particularly given that it will apply retroactively to people who are already living and working here.

This initiative would have several negative consequences:
1. Unfair treatment of current residents.
People who made their life decisions based on the existing 5-year rule - including work, housing, and family planning - would be unfairly disadvantaged if the rules change midway. Retroactive application erodes trust in the Dutch legal and social system, which is known for its predictability and fairness.

2. Negative impact on talent retention and the Dutch economy.
Highly skilled migrants contribute significantly to the Dutch innovation ecosystem and tax base. Extending the naturalisation period will make the Netherlands less attractive compared to other EU countries and could push valuable talent to relocate elsewhere.

3. Contradiction with integration goals.
Naturalisation is a key step for integration and social stability. Delaying this step by doubling the waiting period risks creating a group of long-term residents who contribute fully but remain excluded from full participation in society for a decade. This does not promote integration - it discourages it.

4. Lack of transition period.
The absence of a transition or grandfathering clause is particularly concerning. People who have already invested years in building their lives in the Netherlands should not be penalised by a sudden policy shift.

The Netherlands has built its reputation as an open, reliable, and forward-thinking country. Maintaining this trust is essential - both for the people who have chosen to make this country their home and for the long-term competitiveness of the Dutch economy.